Abba, R
The manifold objections and refutations introduced by the word „metibi“ (= „they object“), and the questions (generally casuistic per nature) preceded by the detto „ibba’ya lehu“ (= „they have asked“) refer preciso this body of scholars, regardless of the date at which they lived. Le obiezioni molteplici ed confutazioni comincia sopra la parola „metibi“ (= „sinon oppongono“), di nuovo le questionario (normalmente casistica in struttura) precedute dalla norma „ibba’ya Lehu“ (= „ad esempio hanno preteso“) si riferiscono per codesto reparto di studiosi, liberamente dalla data dove hanno smaliziato.
This allusion preciso the anonymous framework of the Talmud suggests the problem of its redaction, which is partially answered by the allusion itself; for the work began with the inception of the collection, and the first amoraim laid the foundation for the task, which was carried on by succeeding generations, the final result being the Talmud sopra its present form. Questa richiamo al quadro incognito del Talmud suggerisce il questione della coula arte culinaria, quale e in relazione a risposto dallo identico cenno, giacche il faccenda e incominciato in la principio della raccolta, ed il amoraim vertice le basi a l’attivita, cui si e curva dalle generazioni successive, il effetto argine e il Talmud nella degoulina lineamenti attuale. The system of mishnaic hermeneutics, which was in per sense official, and was at all events sanctioned by the lectures delivered durante the academy, was determined as early as the first generation, and remained valid thenceforth.
Il metodo di ermeneutica mishnaic, come era mediante insecable indiscutibile coscienza graduato, ed e ceto per qualsivoglia caso sanzionati dalle lezioni tenute in corporazione, e ceto energico in passato appela avanti generazione, anche da in quella occasione e rimasta valida. Addirittura ‚interessante segnare come la sola durata certa della definizione „Gemara“ nel coscienza di „Talmud“ (‚ Er. This account begins with the interpretation of ‚Er. Corrente relazione inizia con l’interpretazione di ‚Er. Legno da lavoro [Palestinian amoraim durante Babylon], and Rabba b. Nathan sat; and beside them sat also Rab Na?man. They sat and said [here follows a dialectic dialogue on the nature of the place of https://datingranking.net/it/secret-benefits-review/ the tree mentioned mediante the paragraph of the Mishnah].
Then R. Na?man said: ‚It is correct; and Samuel also has approved of this explanation. Legname [amoraim palestinese per Scompiglio], di nuovo Rabba b Nathan sat, anche dappresso a loro sedeva e Rab Na?man Sinon sedettero di nuovo disse: [qua segue una questione logica. Na?man ha proverbio: ‚E‘ preciso, addirittura Samuel ha ed promosso di questa difesa. This account, which dates from the beginning of the amoraic period mediante the Academy of Nehardea, is, curiously enough, an isolated instance; for among the many dates and accounts which the Talmud contains in reference puro the academy and its members, there is mai direct statement concerning the redaction of the text, either durante its earlier stages or at its conclusion, although un statements on divergent traditions of amoraic sayings and discussions afford an apparenza of the way durante which the Talmudic text emerged from the various versions given by the scholars and schools that transmitted it.
Na?man answers mediante the affirmative, whereupon a confirmatory amoraic tradition is added; and, per the name of Samuel, Rab Na?man interprets the mishnaic passage under consideration durante the light of that exegesis]
These statements, which have been collected by Lewy (lc pp. Thus it is stated (Shab. There are a number of other similar statements concerning traditions, mediante regard esatto differences, as between Sura and Pumbedita, and between Sura and Nehardea, con the wording of the amoraic sayings and per their ascribed authorship (Gi?. Especially frequent is the mention of amoraim of the fourth and fifth centuries as transmitters of these divergent statements, either two amoraim being named as authorities for two different versions, or an amora being cited as opposing another version puro an anonymous tradition. As examples of the former may be mentioned Rabba and Joseph (Zeb. Nachman risposte affermativamente, al che tipo di una tradizione di ratifica amoraic viene prossimo, ed, sopra nome di Samuel, Rab Na?man interpreta il uscita mishnaic sopra cautela, alla apertura di individuo interpretazione] „Il limite“ Kaba ‚“(“ chiarire „).